Book, Paragraph

 1  II, 3 |           of argument, since it is absurd to seek at the same time
 2  IV, 4 |          if he says nothing, it is absurd to seek to give an account
 3  IV, 4 |         every attribute. For it is absurd if of each subject its own
 4 VII, 5 |    concave-nose nose. And so it is absurd that such things should
 5 VII, 13|       further it is impossible and absurd that the "this", i.e. the
 6 VII, 14|          all these expressions are absurd.~But (2) suppose the Form
 7 VII, 14| consequences and others still more absurd follow. If, then, these
 8   X, 5 |           question would have been absurd; but if they might, even
 9  XI, 6 |            one).~In general, it is absurd to make the fact that the
10 XIII, 2|           the accumulation becomes absurd; for we find ourselves with
11 XIII, 7|       posterior units? All this is absurd and fictitious, and there
12 XIII, 7|           we do both; and so it is absurd to reason back from this
13 XIV, 1 |            something else; this is absurd, for then that subject will
14 XIV, 3 |           a substance. But that is absurd. Not but what (ii) even
15 XIV, 3 |       indefinite dyad.~All this is absurd, and conflicts both with