Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 2 |           because it is better, or worse’; indeed no one even mentions
 2 III, 2 |           because it is better, or worse," but the mathematical sciences
 3 III, 3 |        thing is better and another worse, the better is always prior;
 4  IV, 4 |           to be better and another worse. And if this is so, he must
 5  IV, 4 |           about what is better and worse. And if this is not knowledge
 6   V, 12|         not easily changed for the worse, are called potencies; for
 7   V, 12|         something, whether for the worse or for the better (for even
 8   V, 29|             he would presumably be worse in this case as in the corresponding
 9  IX, 1 | insusceptibility to change for the worse and to destruction by another
10  IX, 9 |           end or actuality must be worse than the potency; for that
11  XI, 7 |        science is called better or worse in virtue of its proper
12 XII, 9 |            would be change for the worse, and this would be already
13 XIII, 1|        predecessors, and others no worse.~Two opinions are held on