Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 1 |         as the Pythagoreans and Plato said, are not attributes
 2 III, 4 |        of the latter character. Plato and the Pythagoreans thought
 3  IV, 5 |        regard to the future, as Plato says, surely the opinion
 4   V, 11|       them,-a distinction which Plato used. (If we consider the
 5   V, 29|        unwillingly-by "limping" Plato means "mimicking a limp",
 6  VI, 2 | practically a mere name. And so Plato was in a sense not wrong
 7 VII, 2 |      number and more real; e.g. Plato posited two kinds of substance-the
 8   X, 2 | Pythagoreans say in earlier and Plato in later times), or there
 9  XI, 8 |         the accidental, so that Plato is not far wrong when he
10 XII, 3 |         natural objects. And so Plato was not far wrong when he
11 XII, 6 |    actuality-e.g. Leucippus and Plato; for they say there is always
12 XII, 6 |      difference.) But again for Plato, at least, it is not permissible
13 XIII, 8|     numbers must rather be what Plato used to say, and there must