Book, Paragraph

 1 III, 3 |   case of things in which the distinction of prior and posterior is
 2  IV, 4 |   accidental; for this is the distinction between substance and accident-"white"
 3  IV, 4 |   same time we have drawn the distinction, that while some predicates
 4   V, 11|     cannot be without them,-a distinction which Plato used. (If we
 5   X, 1 |       said previously, in our distinction of the various meanings
 6   X, 3 |  indicated graphically in our distinction of the contraries, the same
 7  XI, 9 |       of being. There being a distinction in each class of things
 8  XI, 11| essentially movable. The same distinction is found in the case of
 9 XII, 5 |       the privation.) But the distinction of actuality and potentiality
10 XII, 7 |      entities is shown by the distinction of its meanings. For the
11 XIV, 1 |    one, and does not draw the distinction that they are one in definition,