Book, Paragraph

1   I,  9 | asking is plain also from the definition of happiness; for it has
2   I,  10|    now discussed confirms our definition. For no function of man
3   I,  13|       are, or are distinct by definition but by nature inseparable,
4  II,  6 |      of its substance and the definition which states its essence
5  IV,  8 |      hearer? Or is the latter definition, at any rate, itself indefinite,
6   V,  2 |     of the first, because its definition falls within the same genus;
7   V,  9 |   treated unjustly. Or is our definition incorrect; must we to "harming
8 VII,  4 |       in his case the general definition of man differed little from
9 VII,  4 |      differed little from the definition peculiar to him, but yet