Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  2 |      previously existing in the parent. And since they are differentiated
 2   I,  17|       they argue that since the parent is deficient in this part
 3   I,  18|         the same form as in the parent plant.~We may also ask whether
 4   I,  18|     same parts coming from each parent, which is why they need
 5   I,  18|     from different parts of the parent, meeting together in one
 6   I,  18|     formed from one part of the parent? Indeed, this theory seems
 7   I,  18|        from all the body of the parent be increased or grow? It
 8   I,  18|       semen coming from all the parent or not, but in the mutual
 9   I,  18|    coming from all parts of the parent, for they would then resemble
10   I,  18|   before they were cut from the parent plant, they bore their fruit
11   I,  18|    female, others from only one parent, as is the case with plants
12   I,  18|       comes from the generating parent is called the seminal fluid,
13  II,  1 |         outside the body of the parent, as has been said already.
14  II,  1 |       taking it from the female parent, as all those which are
15  II,  1 |      function of the generating parent. So, then, it is not possible
16  II,  1 |     movement set up by the male parent, who is in actuality what
17  II,  4 |  produced from a male or female parent nor from a union of the
18  II,  6 |       is the nature of the male parent that gives it, or with animals
19  II,  6 |      they are set free from the parent they are more perfect than
20 III,  2 |        the seed attached to the parent plant, and there is the
21 III,  4 |   through any attachment to the parent. The reason is similar to
22 III,  7 |        that comes from the male parent.... for the male contributes
23  IV,  1 |   depends on the question which parent it is whose semen prevails,—
24  IV,  1 |     male and some in the female parent, which is why they desire
25  IV,  1 |         of the body of the male parent and if the secretion of
26  IV,  1 |   sundered", part in the female parent and part in the male, as
27  IV,  1 |   embryo is drawn off from each parent and the combination of the
28  IV,  1 |        offspring resembling the parent, but I mean the first moving
29  IV,  1 |       the offspring is like the parent. For it makes no difference
30  IV,  3 |      him considered simply as a parent and not in reference to
31  IV,  3 |          as for instance if the parent is a scholar or the neighbour
32  IV,  3 |        the movement of the male parent be resolved, it changes
33  IV,  3 |      the movement of the female parent changes into that of her
34  IV,  3 |         child is more like that parent of the two from whom comes
35  IV,  3 |       coming the male or female parent, and that this is why one
36  IV,  3 |        offspring resembles that parent from which it has derived
37  IV,  4 | imperfect, is so far unlike the parent; now monstrosities also
38  IV,  4 |      class of things unlike the parent. Therefore this accident