Paragraph

 1 1 |       in number.~Next, why are man and bird bipeds, but fish
 2 1 |      fish footless; and why do man and bird, though both bipeds,
 3 1 |     curvature of the legs. For man bends his legs convexly,
 4 1 |     his bent concavely; again, man bends his arms and legs
 5 1 |       opposite directions to a man’s, and in opposite directions
 6 4 |        alike right-handed. And man has the left limbs detached
 7 4 |    separate from it, and so in man the right is more especially
 8 4 |        only reasonable that in man the left should be most
 9 4 | movable, and most detached. In man, too, the other starting-points
10 5 |      are erect, and of bipeds, man par excellence; for man
11 5 |        man par excellence; for man is the most natural of bipeds.
12 9 |        exhibits the fact. If a man were to walk parallel to
13 10|    without their wings. Even a man does not walk without moving
14 11|    carry itself easily. And so man, the only erect animal,
15 11|        not be a biped. As in a man or a quadruped, the thigh
16 11|    erect in the sense in which man is. For as it holds its
17 12|       in the opposite way to a man’s limbs. For men bend their
18 12|        one forward motion.~Now man, being a biped and making
19 12|     the same as in the case of man, for in this respect they
20 13|  elephant among quadrupeds and man if you consider his arms
21 13|      and his legs convexly.~In man, too, the flexions of the