Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |      uniformly of all the things that come-to-be and pass-away by nature.
 2   I, 1 |               of which Earth and Fire come-to-be through a change of qualities
 3   I, 2 |         conditions under which things come-to-be and pass-away, he confined
 4   I, 2 |              similar compound things, come-to-be; nor again did he examine
 5   I, 2 |               dissociation" that they come-to-be and pass-away, we must concentrate
 6   I, 2 |     difficulties, is this: "Do things come-to-be and "alter" and grow, and
 7   I, 2 |          nothings, then it might both come-to-be out of nothings and exist
 8   I, 2 |          constituents and how does it come-to-be out of them? Or how are
 9   I, 2 |          incorporeal: and so it might come-to-be again either out of points
10   I, 3 |              comes-to-be will have to come-to-be out of nothing.~Although
11   I, 3 |          offered: In one sense things come-to-be out of that which has no "
12   I, 3 |             yet in another sense they come-to-be always out of what is".
13   I, 3 |               are some things said to come-to-be and pass-away without qualification,
14   I, 3 | comes-to-be-something", but does not "come-to-be" without qualification;
15   I, 3 |            into Wind and Air, and to "come-to-be" when they change into what
16   I, 3 |          considering where two things come-to-be reciprocally out of one
17   I, 3 |             growing thing is said to "come-to-be".~The distinction here turns
18   I, 3 |           substance, are not said to "come-to-be" without qualification,
19   I, 3 |              otherwise they would not come-to-be reciprocally out of one
20   I, 4 |       persists, in the thing that has come-to-be, the same as it was in the
21   I, 5 |               that body and magnitude come-to-be out of something which,
22   I, 5 |             water, so that they might come-to-be actually an indeterminate
23   I, 5 |        passed-away and the latter has come-to-be, and-if anything has grown-there
24   I, 5 |             then, has passed-away and come-to-be flesh. But it has not been
25   I, 5 |               growing thing which has come-to-be flesh (and grown) by the
26   I, 5 |          Quantum-in-general" does not come-to-be any more than "animal" which
27   I, 5 |              in growth. But what does come-to-be in growth is flesh or bone-or
28   I, 5 |           organic parts). Such things come-to-be, then, by the accession
29   I, 6 |              is a sense in which they come-to-be: and, if they do come-to-be,
30   I, 6 |           come-to-be: and, if they do come-to-be, whether all of them come-to-be
31   I, 6 |       come-to-be, whether all of them come-to-be in the same manner reciprocally
32   I, 8 |                there never could have come-to-be a multiplicity, nor from
33   I, 8 |              their aggregated masses, come-to-be and pass-away. Nor is it
34   I, 10|              that which is such as to come-to-be and pass-away. As soon,
35  II, 1 |               criticism. Things which come-to-be and pass-away cannot be
36  II, 1 |              the so-called "clements" come-to-be), it has no separate existence,
37  II, 4 |              perception, that they do come-to-be: for otherwise there would
38  II, 4 |               is by nature such as to come-to-be out of every one: and when
39  II, 4 |               that all the "elements" come-to-be out of any one of them;
40  II, 5 |             the speed with which they come-to-be, one out of another, is
41  II, 5 |            impossible also for any to come-to-be. For if one is to result
42  II, 6 |          nature. For the things which come-to-be by natural process all exhibit,
43  II, 7 |             the sense in which bricks come-to-be out of a wall-are faced
44  II, 7 |            and beside, the "elements" come-to-be out of them? Let me illustrate
45  II, 7 |      illustrate my meaning. Water can come-to-be out of Fire and Fire out
46  II, 7 |                presumably, and marrow come-to-be out of them. How, then,
47  II, 7 |            that Fire and Water do not come-to-be "out of any and every part
48  II, 7 |               although a sphere might come-to-be out of this part of a lump
49  II, 7 |             for either figure to have come-to-be out of either part indifferently:
50  II, 7 |             when "both Fire and Water come-to-be out of any and every part
51  II, 7 |        liberty to conceive that "both come-to-be out of flesh" in that manner,
52  II, 7 |               stone and a brick "both come-to-be out of a wall"-viz. each
53  II, 7 |               of the "elements" there come-to-be flesh and bones and the
54  II, 8 |               all the "simple" bodies come-to-be out of one another, Fire
55  II, 9 |            some things are such as to come-to-be and pass-away, and since
56  II, 9 |             then, of the things which come-to-be are equal in number to,
57  II, 9 |           things which~are such as to come-to-be is "that which can be-and-not-be":
58  II, 9 |           things which are such as to come-to-be; while cause, in the~sense
59  II, 9 |              the Form, it is said to "come-to-be" qua sharing in," to "pass-away"
60  II, 9 |               both in the things that come-to-be by art and in those that
61  II, 9 |             cause" of the things that come-to-be: for the wood must be divided
62  II, 10|              by which the things that come-to-be and pass-away are implicated
63  II, 10|               processes by which they come-to-be must be "irregular" too,
64  II, 10|            coming-to-be should itself come-to-be perpetually" is the closest
65  II, 11|               one of them may fail to come-to-be. For that some of them may
66  II, 11|               are all the things that come-to-be of this contingent character?
67  II, 11|         necessary for some of them to come-to-be? Is there, in fact, a distinction
68  II, 11|        necessary that solstices shall come-to-be, i.e. impossible that they
69  II, 11|              the antecedent must have come-to-be if the consequent is to
70  II, 11|            that foundations must have come-to-be if there is to be a house:
71  II, 11|             true? If foundations have come-to-be, must a house come-to-be?
72  II, 11|              come-to-be, must a house come-to-be? The answer seems to be
73  II, 11|             to-be if foundations have come-to-be", as well as vice versa.
74  II, 11|            that the consequent should come-to-be, the antecedent also must
75  II, 11|             antecedent also must have come-to-be: and if the antecedent has
76  II, 11|             and if the antecedent has come-to-be, then the consequent also
77  II, 11|               when the antecedent has come-to-be the consequent must always
78  II, 11|            the consequent must always come-to-be too.~Now (i) if the sequence
79  II, 11|               other member shall have come-to-be before "this" as the presupposed
80  II, 11|          necessity that "this" should come-to-be: consequently, since what
81  II, 11|              the remaining members to come-to-be.~Nor again (ii) will it
82  II, 11|                for any one of them to come-to-be. We cannot truly say, e.g.
83  II, 11|              necessary for a house to come-to-be when foundations have been
84  II, 11|       necessary for the consequent to come-to-be. And this reciprocal nexus
85  II, 11|               is coming-to-be and has come-to-be: and if the coming-to-be
86  II, 11|              this eternal revolution "come-to-be" of necessity, and of necessity "
87  II, 11|            the seasons in consequence come-to-be in a cycle, i.e. return
88  II, 11|            themselves; and since they come-to-be cyclically, so in their