Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |     proceed. For to suppose that a body (i.e. a magnitude) is divisible
 2   I, 2 |          What will there be in the body which escapes the division?~
 3   I, 2 |    principle will apply whenever a body is by nature divisible through
 4   I, 2 |          whereas ex hypothesis the body was divisible through and
 5   I, 2 |            admitted that neither a body nor a magnitude will remain,
 6   I, 2 |            the constituents of the body will either be points (i.e.
 7   I, 2 |          thus presumably the whole body will be nothing but an appearance.
 8   I, 2 |            bigger (since, when the body was divided into two or
 9   I, 2 |           But suppose that, as the body is being divided, a minute
10   I, 2 |           and that in this sense-a body "comes away" from the magnitude,
11   I, 2 |         what "came away" was not a body but a separable form or
12   I, 2 |     supposition that any and every body, whatever its size, is divisible
13   I, 2 | paradoxical that every perceptible body should be indivisible as
14   I, 2 |        seem to be impossible for a body to be, even potentially,
15   I, 2 |           the result, not that the body would simultaneously be
16   I, 2 |        nothing will remain and the body will have passed-away into
17   I, 2 |           now it is obvious that a body is in fact divided into
18   I, 2 |          the process of dividing a body part by part is not a "breaking
19   I, 2 |            ad infinitum; nor can a body be simultaneously divided
20   I, 2 |             respectively-is that a body must contain atomic magnitudes
21   I, 4 |           or as intermediates. The body, e.g. although persisting
22   I, 4 |    although persisting as the same body, is now healthy and now
23   I, 5 |             Are we to suppose that body and magnitude come-to-be
24   I, 5 |          potentially magnitude and body, is actually incorporeal
25   I, 5 |           but contained in another body?~Perhaps it is impossible
26   I, 5 |             i.e. a non-perceptible body. But the first of these
27   I, 5 |            contained in some other body. But if it is to be "in"
28   I, 5 |           it is to be "in" another body and yet remains "separate"
29   I, 5 |            no sense a part of that body (neither a part of its substantial
30   I, 5 |          one with the "containing" body, though isolable from it
31   I, 5 |           matter, out of which the body comes-to-be, as points or
32   I, 5 |        such-and-such a determinate body, for there is no such thing
33   I, 5 |          there is no such thing as body in general), this same matter
34   I, 5 |     magnitude: for this would be a body's coming-to-be rather than
35   I, 5 |            incorporeal or (b) of a body. Now, if (a) it grows by
36   I, 5 |        grows by the accession of a body, there will be two bodies-that
37   I, 5 |     passing-away of the contrasted body. It is not a growth of either.
38   I, 5 |          which passed-away), e.g. "body", and this grows. The water
39   I, 5 |  grown-there has been a growth of "body." Yet this too is impossible.
40   I, 5 |    sometimes expand as well as the body that has consumed it (that
41   I, 5 |          also (a) that the growing body is not "void" and that yet
42   I, 5 |          definition. That is why a body's" nutrition" continues
43   I, 7 |            is a law of nature that body is affected by body, flavour
44   I, 7 |           that body is affected by body, flavour by flavour, colour
45   I, 8 |           the more transparent the body, the more frequent and serial
46   I, 8 |   continuous pores all through the body. But this last alternative
47   I, 8 |            be nothing solid in the body (nothing beside the pores)
48   I, 8 |      superfluous. For if the whole body suffers action under these
49   I, 8 |        having no pores at all? The body will be uniformly "full"
50   I, 8 |            too minute to admit any body", it is absurd to suppose
51   I, 8 |         means anything else than a body's place-whence it clearly
52   I, 8 |      clearly follows that to every body there will correspond a
53   I, 8 |  ridiculous: for, qua divisible, a body can fall into separate parts.~
54   I, 9 |            So long, indeed, as any body is naturally coherent and
55   I, 9 |            suffer action-heats the body.) But the supposition that
56   I, 9 |         But the supposition that a body is "susceptible in some
57   I, 9 |           or planes-then indeed no body would be susceptible through
58   I, 9 |            false, i.e. since every body is divisible, there is no
59   I, 9 |         being divisible". For if a body "can be separated at the
60   I, 9 |   alteration": but we see the same body liquid at one time and solid
61   I, 10|            as "combining" with the body, nor (iii) of the shape
62   I, 10|       fashioning the lump. Nor can body "combine" with white, nor (
63   I, 10|           a) persist actually, as "body" and "white" persist: nor (
64   I, 10|            of the other. But every body is divisible and therefore,
65   I, 10|     divisible and therefore, since body "combined" with body is
66   I, 10|         since body "combined" with body is uniform in texture throughout,
67   I, 10|            a part of the other.~No body, however, can be divided
68  II, 1 |     between these two (but still a body with a separate existence).
69  II, 1 |        separable matter. For this "body" of theirs cannot possibly
70  II, 1 |            potentially perceptible body, secondly the contrarieties (
71  II, 1 |            originative sources" of body? For all the other thinkers
72  II, 2 |            sources" of perceptible body; and since "perceptible"
73  II, 2 |            originative sources" of body, but only those which correspond
74  II, 2 |           is a quality of tangible body not qua tangible, but qua
75  II, 3 |            them. Thus the "simple" body corresponding to fire is "
76  II, 3 |           and Air are forms of the body moving towards the "limit",
77  II, 3 |         and Water are forms of the body which moves towards the "
78  II, 4 |          the pair: but no "simple" body can be formed either out
79  II, 4 |        qualities. Thus no "simple" body would result, if the dry
80  II, 5 |      beside these four, some other body from which they originate-a
81  II, 6 |  Empedocles that the "elements" of body are more than one, so that
82  II, 8 |       Earth because every "simple" body is to be found specially
83  II, 10|     continuous, there must be some body always being moved (in order
84  II, 10|           retreating of the moving body are caused by the inclination.
85  II, 10|            inclination is that the body becomes alternately remote
86  II, 10|      continuous movement, viz. the body which is being moved in
87  II, 11|            For since the revolving body is always setting something