Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |        that there are indivisible bodies, infinite both in number
 2   I, 1 |      rather than flesh, bone, and bodies which, like these, are "
 3   I, 1 |           Fire and Earth, and the bodies co-ordinate with these?
 4   I, 2 | indivisible magnitudes, are these bodies, as Democritus and Leucippus
 5   I, 2 |           the Timaeus?~To resolve bodies into planes and no further-this,
 6   I, 2 |        that there are indivisible bodies. Yet even these involve
 7   I, 2 |       exists for those who divide bodies into planes. For nothing
 8   I, 2 |         there must be indivisible bodies and magnitudes. Yet, if
 9   I, 6 |         as those who generate the bodies that are compounded of the
10   I, 6 |         or the other of them. But bodies which are heavy or light
11   I, 8 |       water and other transparent bodies, because such bodies possess
12   I, 8 |  transparent bodies, because such bodies possess pores, invisible
13   I, 8 |          the structure of certain bodies. They do not restrict it
14   I, 8 |         do not restrict it to the bodies which act and suffer action:
15   I, 8 |         takes place "only between bodies whose pores are in reciprocal
16   I, 8 |           one that applied to all bodies, was advanced by Leucippus
17   I, 8 |      alteration". For the primary bodies of the Atomists-the primary
18   I, 8 |     primary constituents of which bodies are composed, and the ultimate
19   I, 8 |        evident that all the other bodies down to the "elements" have
20   I, 8 |        that each of the composite bodies is divisible), but (b) according
21   I, 8 |          of view, that the larger bodies should be more liable to
22   I, 8 |        since they (viz. the large bodies) are easily broken up because
23   I, 8 |           collide with many other bodies. But why should indivisibility
24   I, 8 |      small, rather than of large, bodies?~IV. Again, is the substance
25   I, 8 |         penetrate the transparent bodies at their "contacts"; and
26   I, 8 |          though they must contain bodies, are "void", the same consequence
27   I, 8 |          conceive them. But since bodies are divisible through and
28   I, 9 |           insusceptible. So, too, bodies are insusceptible so long
29   I, 9 |         one another or with other bodies which are by nature such
30   I, 9 |          manner only, viz. by the bodies being split. For this theory
31   I, 10|           by "combining" with the bodies of the patients. Amongst
32  II, 1 |           so-called "elements" of bodies.~For the complex substances
33  II, 1 |        presuppose the perceptible bodies as the condition of their
34  II, 1 |       underlies these perceptible bodies. Some maintain it is single,
35  II, 1 |         who postulate, beside the bodies we have mentioned, a single
36  II, 1 |         matter of the perceptible bodies (a matter out of which the
37  II, 1 |        explanation of the primary bodies as well, since they too
38  II, 1 |      thirdly", however: for these bodies change into one another (
39  II, 2 |        qualities-that the primary bodies are differentiated. That
40  II, 3 |           the apparently "simple" bodies (Fire, Air, Water, and Earth)
41  II, 3 |     distributed among the primary bodies, and the number of the latter
42  II, 3 |           all who make the simple bodies "elements" postulate either
43  II, 3 |          and air, and each of the bodies we have mentioned, are not
44  II, 3 |         but blended. The "simple" bodies are indeed similar in nature
45  II, 3 |         out of fire.~The "simple" bodies, since they are four, fall
46  II, 4 |      coming-to-be of the "simple" bodies is reciprocal. At the same
47  II, 4 |      coming-to-be of the "simple" bodies will be cyclical; and that
48  II, 4 |          into any of the "simple" bodies can result from the passingaway
49  II, 5 |      matter" of which the natural bodies consist, as some thinkers
50  II, 6 |          absurd that the "simple" bodies, though they are not transformable,
51  II, 6 |            since (a) the "simple" bodies appear to move "naturally"
52  II, 6 |           in motion, the "simple" bodies themselves have absolutely
53  II, 7 |           the "elements" of which bodies are composed. The theories
54  II, 7 |         ratio. Thus all the other bodies will result from the contraries,
55  II, 8 |      composed of all the "simple" bodies. For they all contain Earth
56  II, 8 |      Water, alone of the "simple" bodies, is readily adaptable in
57  II, 8 |          include all the "simple" bodies.~Additional evidence seems
58  II, 8 |          whereas all the "simple" bodies come-to-be out of one another,
59  II, 8 |   explained that all the compound bodies are composed of all the "
60  II, 8 |      composed of all the "simple" bodies.~
61  II, 9 |         forces which enable these bodies to bring things into being-with
62  II, 10|     problem-viz. why the "simple" bodies, since each them is travelling
63  II, 10|        But (d) amongst continuous bodies which are moved, only that