Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |                  to study coming-to-be and passing-away. We are to distinguish the
 2   I, 1 |              events, that coming-to-be and passing-away are the same as "being altered":"
 3   I, 1 |              maintain that coming-tobe and passing-away are "alteration". For they
 4   I, 1 |                  describe coming-to-be and passing-away in these terms is in accordance
 5   I, 2 |                   explain coming-to-be and passing-away by their "dissociation"
 6   I, 2 | consequence-especially if coming-to-be and passing-away are to take place by "association"
 7   I, 2 |              assert, that coming-to-be and passing-away in the unqualified and complete
 8   I, 2 |               unqualified coming-to-be and passing-away are not effected by "association"
 9   I, 2 |                    will be coming-to-be or passing-away: but when it is in the thing'
10   I, 2 |                  thing's susceptibility to passing-away. For if water has first
11   I, 3 |            question might be raised about "passing-away" also. For if a substantial
12   I, 3 |                    which the thing that is passing-away will necessarily change.
13   I, 3 |             matter-to which it is due that passing-away and coming-to-be never fail
14   I, 3 |               ceaseless? Is it because the passing-away of this is a coming-to-be
15   I, 3 |                 the coming-to-be of this a passing-away of something else?~The cause
16   I, 3 |               account for coming-to-be and passing-away in their general character
17   I, 3 |                 coming to-be of this but a passing-away of that, and a passing-away
18   I, 3 |                passing-away of that, and a passing-away of this but a coming-to-be
19   I, 3 |                  For (i) we say "it is now passing-away" without qualification,
20   I, 3 |                    and not merely "this is passing-away": and we call this change "
21   I, 3 |                   coming-to-be", and that "passing-away", without qualification.
22   I, 3 |         coming-to-be", though unqualified "passing-away" (e.g. of Fire). This would
23   I, 3 |               qualification is unqualified passing-away, while the passage into
24   I, 3 |                 qualified coming-to-be and passing-away: but they are also distinguished
25   I, 3 |                    material, they call it "passing-away". For they distinguish "
26   I, 3 |                 attribute coming-to-be and passing-away uniformly to them both,
27   I, 3 |                    every coming-to-be is a passing-away of something else and every
28   I, 3 |                   something else and every passing-away some other thing's coming-to-be.
29   I, 3 |                   of one thing is always a passing-away of another, and the passing-away
30   I, 3 |           passing-away of another, and the passing-away of one thing is always another'
31   I, 3 |                 just as people speak of "a passing-away" without qualification when
32   I, 3 |                fail. For coming-to-be is a passing-away of "what is not" and passing-away
33   I, 3 |          passing-away of "what is not" and passing-away is a coming to-be of "what
34   I, 4 |        coming-to-be of one substance and a passing-away of the other-especially
35   I, 4 |        coming-to-be of unmusicalness and a passing-away of musicalness: but in fact "
36   I, 4 |                  unmusical man, they are a passing-away and a coming-to-be.) Consequently
37   I, 4 |                    the converse change is "passing-away".~"Matter", in the most
38   I, 5 |               change is taking place-and a passing-away of the contrasted body.
39   I, 5 |                unqualified coming-to-be or passing-away, that which grows or "alters"
40   I, 7 |            constitute the entire sphere of passing-away and coming-to-be.~We can
41   I, 8 |                    either coming-to-be and passing-away or motion and the multiplicity
42   I, 8 |                   separating they produce "passing-away". Moreover, they act and
43   I, 8 |               explained: breaking-up (i.e. passing-away) is effected by means of
44   I, 8 |                Empedocles, there is to be "passing-away" as well as "alteration".
45   I, 10|             coming-to-be, but the wood is "passing-away". Similarly, we speak neither (
46  II, 1 |              unqualified" coming-to-be and passing-away, and explained under what
47  II, 1 |              differs from coming-to-be and passing-away. But we have still to investigate
48  II, 1 |                  of their coming-to-be and passing-away: but philosophers disagree
49  II, 1 |          alteration", the coming-to-be and passing-away of things. (Some, for instance,
50  II, 4 |            coming-to-be is effected by the passing-away of a single quality: whereas,
51  II, 9 |                     Hence coming-to-be~and passing-away must occur within the field
52  II, 9 |                both of coming-to-be and of passing-away". On the other hand (b)
53  II, 10|              proved, that coming-to-be and passing-away happen to things continuously;
54  II, 10|                     either coming-to-be or passing-away will always result. The
55  II, 10|                    For if coming-to-be and passing-away are always to be continuous,
56  II, 10|                   the natural processes of passing-away and coming-to-be occupy
57  II, 10|                   the natural processes of passing-away and coming-to-be are equal.
58  II, 10|        coming-to-be of these things is the passing-away of other things.~Coming-to-be
59  II, 10|                   things.~Coming-to-be and passing-away will, as we have said, always
60  II, 10|                   i) that coming-to-be and passing-away actually occur, (ii) what