Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |   different names there correspond two separate processes with
 2   I, 2 |          the body was divided into two or more parts, the whole
 3   I, 2 |     contact is always a contact of two somethings, i.e. there is
 4   I, 3 |       Cause" in this connexion has two senses. It means (i) the
 5   I, 3 |       which change takes place are two, and he asserts that these
 6   I, 3 |          and he asserts that these two, viz. what is and what is
 7   I, 3 |        have been considering where two things come-to-be reciprocally
 8   I, 3 |          more than this:-why, when two things change reciprocally
 9   I, 3 |            something in one of the two Columns-e.g. in Substance,
10   I, 3 |    qualification? Is it one of the two contrary poles of the chang-e.
11   I, 5 |   description may be understood in two different ways, in which
12   I, 5 |            ways, in which of these two ways are we to apply it
13   I, 5 |           of a body, there will be two bodies-that which grows
14   I, 5 |         and that yet there are not two magnitudes in the same place,
15   I, 5 |          of something incorporeal.~Two preliminary distinctions
16   I, 6 |         action and passion between two things, that which underlies
17   I, 6 |            the same is true of any two things, of which one "acts"
18   I, 6 |            as the relation between two things which, having position,
19   I, 6 |            as the relation between two things, one able to impart
20   I, 7 |          as they argue) neither of two "likes" is more apt than
21   I, 7 |           on the contrary, even if two things, being "others",
22   I, 7 |         white or black: for unless two things either are, or are
23   I, 7 |              like the "agent", has two meanings. Both (a) that
24   I, 7 |         the basis of either of the two opposed things-being as
25   I, 8 |       great difference between the two theories: the "indivisibles"
26   I, 8 |         drop touches drop (for the two cases are precisely parallel)?
27  II, 1 |        intermediate" between these two (but still a body with a
28  II, 1 |            the contrary, postulate two or more materials-ascribing
29  II, 3 |           postulate either one, or two, or three, or four. Now (
30  II, 3 |        their "originative sources" two, viz. the rare and the dense,
31  II, 3 |            ii) those who postulate two from the start-as Parmenides
32  II, 3 |        between those who postulate two and those who postulate
33  II, 3 |          the middle "element" into two, while the latter treat
34  II, 3 |           as to reduce them to the two, for he opposes all the
35  II, 3 |           they are four, fall into two pairs which belong to the
36  II, 3 |          pairs which belong to the two regions, each to each: for
37  II, 4 |         Fire from Earth, since the two "elements" in both these
38  II, 4 |          if one quality in each of two "elements" pass-away, the
39  II, 4 |      elementary quality in each of two "elements" when they are
40  II, 4 |      single quality: whereas, when two of them are transformed
41  II, 5 |             must be either one, or two, or more. Now they cannot
42  II, 5 |            but, since one of every two contrary qualities is a "
43  II, 5 |       elements" will inevitably be two: for it is "matter" that
44  II, 5 |          is the "mean" between the two contraries, and matter is
45  II, 5 |           are seen to be more than two, the contrarieties must
46  II, 5 | contrarieties must at the least be two. But the contrarieties being
47  II, 5 |            the contrarieties being two, the "elements" must be
48  II, 5 |       though six are possible, the two in which the qualities are
49  II, 5 |         will contain the remaining two "complementary factors",
50  II, 7 |         anything is to result from two of them taken together-e.
51  II, 7 |      identify the resultant of the two "elements" with their matter?
52  II, 7 |            what results from these two contraries will be neither
53  II, 9 |           present as well. For the two first are not sufficient
54  II, 9 |    necessity are not. And of these two sets of things, since~they
55  II, 10|      retreats; and we see that the two processes occupy equal times.
56  II, 11|            the first of these last two alternatives is impossible
57  II, 11|           speaking, is mediated by two, or by many, members.~It