Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |           of qualities due to "the motion". On the other hand, in
 2   I, 3 |      explained (in our treatise on Motion that it involves (a) something
 3   I, 3 |            sets everything else in motion by being itself continuously
 4   I, 4 |        when it is in place, it is "motion"; when it is in property,
 5   I, 6 |             mover" can only impart motion by being itself moved, another
 6   I, 6 |           acting" thing to "impart motion". Nevertheless there is
 7   I, 6 |         only to those things whose motion is a "qualitative affection"-
 8   I, 6 |           the contrary, to "impart motion" is a wider term than to "
 9   I, 6 |       which are "such as to impart motion", if that description be
10   I, 6 |         that one is able to impart motion and the other to be moved,
11   I, 6 |         things, one able to impart motion and the other able to be
12   I, 6 |         ordinary experience impart motion by being moved: in their
13   I, 6 |         kind as the "moved" impart motion by being moved. Hence if
14   I, 6 |          Hence if anything imparts motion without itself being moved,
15   I, 7 |        being moved" and "imparting motion". For the "mover", like
16   I, 7 |          originative source of the motion is thought to "impart motion" (
17   I, 7 |       motion is thought to "impart motion" (for the originative source
18   I, 7 |          wine, as healing. Now, in motion, there is nothing to prevent
19   I, 7 |          last mover always imparts motion by being itself moved: and,
20   I, 7 |        affected; and what holds of motion is true also of the active
21   I, 7 |           active powers. For as in motion "the first mover" is unmoved,
22   I, 8 |           to deny the existence of motion.~Reasoning in this way,
23   I, 8 |   coming-to-be and passing-away or motion and the multiplicity of
24   I, 8 |     Monists that there could be no motion without a void. The result
25   I, 8 |        each of them sets itself in motion, either (a) it will be divisible ("
26   I, 8 |           be divisible ("imparting motion" qua this, "being moved"
27  II, 6 |              Again, his account of motion is vague. For it is not
28  II, 6 |           actually setting them in motion, the "simple" bodies themselves
29  II, 6 |       elements"? What causes their motion? Presumably not Love and
30  II, 6 |         are causes of a particular motion, if at least we assume that "
31  II, 10|          since the change which is motion has been proved" to be eternal,
32  II, 10|       established: for the eternal motion, by causing "the generator"
33  II, 10|           earlier work," we called motion (not coming-to-be) "the
34  II, 10|  coming-to-be is not: hence, also, motion is prior to coming-to-be.~
35  II, 10|   continuously; and we assert that motion causes coming-to-be. That
36  II, 10|            is evident that, if the motion be single, both processes
37  II, 10|             so that, from a single motion, either coming-to-be or
38  II, 10|       either by the sense of their motion or by its irregularity:
39  II, 10|          why it is not the primary motion that causes coming-to-be
40  II, 10|           and passingaway, but the motion along the inclined circle:
41  II, 10|          inclined circle: for this motion not only possesses the necessary
42  II, 10|          movement is caused by the motion of the whole: but the approaching
43  II, 10|            often said, is circular motion: for that is the only motion
44  II, 10|       motion: for that is the only motion which is continuous. That,
45  II, 10|             bodiesimitate circular motion. For when Water is transformed
46  II, 10|           is by imitating circular motion that rectilinear motion
47  II, 10|            motion that rectilinear motion too is continuous.~These
48  II, 10| transformed, however, owing to the motion with its dual character:
49  II, 11|           the eternity of circular motion, i.e. the eternity of the
50  II, 11|          setting something else in motion, the movement of the things