Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |           see in it the changes of magnitude called "growth" and "diminution".
 2   I, 2 |   indivisible magnitudes? Or is no magnitude indivisible?" For the answer
 3   I, 2 |        suppose that a body (i.e. a magnitude) is divisible through and
 4   I, 2 |         What, then, will remain? A magnitude? No: that is impossible,
 5   I, 2 |          that neither a body nor a magnitude will remain, and yet division
 6   I, 2 |            be points (i.e. without magnitude) or absolutely nothing.
 7   I, 2 |            it will not possess any magnitude. For when the points were
 8   I, 2 |         coincided to form a single magnitude, they did not make the whole
 9   I, 2 |             they will not make any magnitude.~But suppose that, as the
10   I, 2 |         body "comes away" from the magnitude, evading the division. Even
11   I, 2 |        form or quality, and if the magnitude is "points or contacts thus
12   I, 2 |           it is paradoxical that a magnitude should consist of elements,
13   I, 2 |     however, it is admitted that a magnitude is "divisible through and
14   I, 2 |            the admission, that the magnitude must be divided away into
15   I, 2 |         only in one sense that the magnitude is "divisible through and
16   I, 5 |            change in the sphere of magnitude is growth and one in the
17   I, 5 | is-potentially to what is-actually magnitude and quality respectively?
18   I, 5 |      diminishing is believed to be magnitude. Are we to suppose that
19   I, 5 |           to suppose that body and magnitude come-to-be out of something
20   I, 5 |          which, though potentially magnitude and body, is actually incorporeal
21   I, 5 |          incorporeal and devoid of magnitude? And since this description
22   I, 5 |       matter is also the matter of magnitude and quality-being separable
23   I, 5 |        which, though potentially a magnitude, actually possesses no magnitude.
24   I, 5 |   magnitude, actually possesses no magnitude. For, if it were, the "void"
25   I, 5 |  diminution is a lessening, of the magnitude which is there already-that,
26   I, 5 |            thing must possess some magnitude. Hence growth must not be
27   I, 5 |      process from a matter without magnitude to an actuality of magnitude:
28   I, 5 |       magnitude to an actuality of magnitude: for this would be a body'
29   I, 5 |         impossible for a matter of magnitude to exist "separate". If,
30   I, 5 |          every part of the growing magnitude is made bigger (e.g. if
31  II, 10|           in which"; for that has "magnitude" in a sense.) But (d) amongst