Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |            contact and coincided to form a single magnitude, they
 2   I, 2 |          not a body but a separable form or quality, and if the magnitude
 3   I, 3 |       occurring.~Why, then, is this form of change necessarily ceaseless?
 4   I, 3 |        which do not. And (the first form of) the distinction, which
 5   I, 3 |       positive predication, i.e. a "form", whereas "cold" is a privation,
 6   I, 3 |             a "this somewhat" or a "form"-than Earth. But they are
 7   I, 5 |         without quality and without form.~Now it is no doubt true,
 8   I, 5 |           other thing which has its form immersed in matter-has a
 9   I, 5 |             twofold nature: for the form as well as the matter is
10   I, 5 |        every part of the tissue qua form should grow-and grow by
11   I, 5 |        every part of its figure or "form".~That growth has taken
12   I, 5 |         matter is distinct from the form is more manifest than in
13   I, 5 |             flesh in respect to its form, but not in respect to its
14   I, 5 |             this food into the same form as that of flesh as if,
15   I, 5 |              it is nourishment.~The form of which we have spoken
16   I, 5 |           quantum; though still the form persists.~
17   I, 10|           gallons of water: for its form is dissolved, and it is
18   I, 10|              receptive matter" and "form" respectively. The behaviour
19  II, 8 |           is the "figure"-i.e. the "form" taken along with the matter.
20  II, 8 |            the rest-is akin to the "form" because it tends by nature
21  II, 8 |          but the "figure"-i.e. the "form"-Of them all is at the limits.~
22  II, 9 |             second in the sense of "form": and, in addition, the
23  II, 9 |               is their "figure" or "form"-and that is the~formula
24  II, 9 |            to "be" in virtue of the Form, it is said to "come-to-be"
25  II, 9 |       pass-away" qua "losing," the "Form". Hence he thinks that "
26  II, 9 |             cause is other than the Form. For it is the doctor who
27  II, 9 |         essential nature, i.e. the "form". And what is more, since
28  II, 10| distinguished the "matter" and the "form". Further, since the change
29  II, 10|          coming-to-be) "the primary form of change". For it is far