Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3 |       out of one another, i.e. contraries out of contraries? For these
 2   I, 3 |         i.e. contraries out of contraries? For these things-Fire,
 3   I, 3 |  Air-are characterized by "the contraries".~Perhaps the solution is
 4   I, 4 |       to one another either as contraries or as intermediates. The
 5   I, 4 |         being one of a pair of contraries) persists, in the thing
 6   I, 7 |      are, or are composed of, "contraries", neither drives the other
 7   I, 7 |        a "contrariety" or are "contraries"-and not any things selected
 8   I, 7 |    kind-the reason being that "contraries" are in every case within
 9   I, 7 |     identical kind, and it is "contraries" which reciprocally act
10   I, 7 |      unlike", while (b) it is "contraries" that exhibit this character:
11   I, 7 |   character: it is clear that "contraries" and their "intermediates"
12   I, 7 |       was concentrated on the "contraries". We must conceive the same
13  II, 3 |       combined in six couples. Contraries, however, refuse to be coupled:
14  II, 4 |  coming-to-be is a change into contraries and out of contraries, and
15  II, 4 |     into contraries and out of contraries, and the "elements" all
16  II, 5 |  Earth-because "Change is into contraries". For if they all were Air,
17  II, 5 |     the "mean" between the two contraries, and matter is imperceptible
18  II, 5 |    belonging to A F. Let these contraries be whiteness and blackness.
19  II, 5 |     black since change is into contraries. Water, therefore, must
20  II, 7 |    what results from these two contraries will be neither their matter,
21  II, 7 |    bodies will result from the contraries, or rather from the "elements",
22  II, 7 | elements" will result from the contraries, in so far as these "exist
23  II, 7 |       is matter. Moreover (ii) contraries also "suffer action", in
24  II, 7 |     another (and all the other contraries behave in a similar way).
25  II, 7 |      the moist, as well as the contraries we have used as examples,
26  II, 10|        contrary effects demand contraries as their causes.~This explains
27  II, 10|        contrary effects demand contraries as their causes; and the