Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1|     Leucippus say that there are indivisible bodies, infinite both in
 2   I, 2|          the primary "reals" are indivisible magnitudes? Or is no magnitude
 3   I, 2|   magnitudes? Or is no magnitude indivisible?" For the answer we give
 4   I, 2|          the primary "reals" are indivisible magnitudes, are these bodies,
 5   I, 2|          the view that there are indivisible bodies. Yet even these involve
 6   I, 2|         or points, there must be indivisible bodies and magnitudes. Yet,
 7   I, 2|       perceptible body should be indivisible as well as divisible at
 8   I, 2| simultaneously be actually both (indivisible and divided), but that it
 9   I, 8|      reason is part of the Whole indivisible, i.e. a plenum, and part
10   I, 8|      contiguous discretes" to be indivisible, while the intervals between
11   I, 8|     which they are dissolved-are indivisible, differing from one another
12   I, 8| elementary constituents that are indivisible and distinctively characterized
13   I, 8|           Now we have discussed "indivisible planes" in the preceding
14   I, 8|     regard to the assumption of "indivisible solids", although we must
15   I, 8|          to the view that every "indivisible" is incapable alike of receiving
16   I, 8|         and of producing one-no "indivisible" can be, e.g. either hard
17   I, 8|    Democritus says "the more any indivisible exceeds, the heavier it
18   I, 8|       another: the "slightly-hot indivisible", e.g. will inevitably suffer
19   I, 8|          in heat. Again, if any "indivisible" is "hard", there must also
20   I, 8|          to each-e.g. that this "indivisible" should be cold and that "
21   I, 8|         should be cold and that "indivisible" hot. For, on that supposition,
22   I, 8|     should belong to the single "indivisible". For, being indivisible,
23   I, 8|         indivisible". For, being indivisible, it will possess these properties
24   I, 9|          the contrary, there are indivisible solids or planes-then indeed
25   I, 9|       i.e. congealed) particles "indivisible in their bulk": on the contrary,
26  II, 7|      considerable extent and not indivisible. Similarly, it is qua reduced