Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |          elements, and are thus "simple" rather than flesh, bone,
 2   I, 1 |    regard the "homoeomeries" as "simple" and elements, whilst they
 3  II, 3 |    themselves to the apparently "simple" bodies (Fire, Air, Water,
 4  II, 3 |     theory. For all who make the simple bodies "elements" postulate
 5  II, 3 |          have mentioned, are not simple, but blended. The "simple"
 6  II, 3 |        simple, but blended. The "simple" bodies are indeed similar
 7  II, 3 |   identical with them. Thus the "simple" body corresponding to fire
 8  II, 3 |         ice or out of fire.~The "simple" bodies, since they are
 9  II, 4 |         the coming-to-be of the "simple" bodies is reciprocal. At
10  II, 4 |         the coming-to-be of the "simple" bodies will be cyclical;
11  II, 4 |        however, into any of the "simple" bodies can result from
12  II, 4 |        left in the pair: but no "simple" body can be formed either
13  II, 4 |    contrary, qualities. Thus no "simple" body would result, if the
14  II, 6 |      manifestly absurd that the "simple" bodies, though they are
15  II, 6 |         Moreover, since (a) the "simple" bodies appear to move "
16  II, 6 |     setting them in motion, the "simple" bodies themselves have
17  II, 8 |    body-are composed of all the "simple" bodies. For they all contain
18  II, 8 |     contain Earth because every "simple" body is to be found specially
19  II, 8 |         and Water, alone of the "simple" bodies, is readily adaptable
20  II, 8 |   compound will include all the "simple" bodies.~Additional evidence
21  II, 8 | understand why, whereas all the "simple" bodies come-to-be out of
22  II, 8 |         are composed of all the "simple" bodies.~
23  II, 9 |       forces they assign to the "simple" bodies-the forces which
24  II, 10|      powers of action" e.g. the "simple" bodiesimitate circular
25  II, 10|   baffling problem-viz. why the "simple" bodies, since each them