Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 5 |    been affected. The altering agent, however, and the originative
 2   I, 6 |   alteration": but) without an agent and a patient there cannot
 3   I, 6 |         act", if (a) the term "agent" is to be used in contrast
 4   I, 7 |       himself. He asserts that agent and patient are identical,
 5   I, 7 |      suffer action and to act, agent and patient must be "like" (
 6   I, 7 |      and suffer action.) Hence agent and patient must be in one
 7   I, 7 |      And since (a) patient and agent are generically identical (
 8   I, 7 |        itself the patient. For agent and patient are contrary
 9   I, 7 |   patient must change into the agent, since it is only thus that
10   I, 7 | distinction in speaking of the agent: for sometimes we say that "
11   I, 7 |      of thinkers supposed that agent and patient must possess
12   I, 7 |     For the "mover", like the "agent", has two meanings. Both (
13   I, 7 |  distinction holds also of the agent: for we speak not only (
14   I, 7 |   nothing to prevent the first agent being unaffected, while
15   I, 7 |     unaffected, while the last agent only acts by suffering action
16   I, 7 |   suffering action itself. For agent and patient have not the
17   I, 7 |      have not the same matter, agent acts without being affected:
18   I, 7 |      hot, provided the heating agent is there, i.e. comes near.
19   I, 7 |       active powers "the first agent" is unaffected.~The active
20   I, 7 |  metaphorically.) For when the agent is there, the patient he-comes
21   I, 8 |     that the "last" agent-the "agent" in the strictest sense-enters
22   I, 8 |        superfluous. For if the agent produces no effect by touching
23   I, 10|  effect takes a long time when agent and patient are present