Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |  amateur might have made. They said that things grow "by the
 2   I, 2 |      Hence there is more to be said for the view that there
 3   I, 2 |     paradox. Still, as we have said, it is possible to construct "
 4   I, 3 |      quoted above, then (as we said)" properties will be separable
 5   I, 3 |      that, why are some things said to come-to-be and pass-away
 6   I, 3 |        why things are commonly said to "pass-away" without qualification
 7   I, 3 |        But why are some things said to "come to-be" without
 8   I, 3 | although the learning thing is said to "come-to-be-learned"
 9   I, 3 |       yet the growing thing is said to "come-to-be".~The distinction
10   I, 3 |     signify substance, are not said to "come-to-be" without
11   I, 5 | prevailing ingredient which is said to have increased in volume.
12   I, 5 |      to "alteration". Flesh is said to have been "altered" if,
13   I, 5 |        is called "food" and is said to be "contrary" to flesh,
14   I, 6 |        too: for the "mover" is said to "act" (in a sense) and
15   I, 7 |        near. Hence (as we have said) some of the active powers
16  II, 9 |     and that "while a thing is said to "be" in virtue of the
17  II, 9 |      virtue of the Form, it is said to "come-to-be" qua sharing
18  II, 10|  passing-away will, as we have said, always be continuous, and
19  II, 10| coming-to-be, as we have often said, is circular motion: for
20  II, 10|       clear from what has been said (i) that coming-to-be and