Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 3|            be coming-to-be without qualification, "something" must-without
 2   I, 3|       which has no "being" without qualification: yet in another sense they
 3   I, 3| potentially is), while without the qualification "potentially" it is not
 4   I, 3|   come-to-be and pass-away without qualification, but others only with a
 5   I, 3|             but others only with a qualification?~The distinction must be
 6   I, 3|          now passing-away" without qualification, and not merely "this is
 7   I, 3|             passing-away", without qualification. And (ii) so-and-so "comes-to-be-something",
 8   I, 3|           not "come-to-be" without qualification; for we say that the student "
 9   I, 3|          not "comes-to-be" without qualification.~(i) Now we often divide
10   I, 3|        what "is" not except with a qualification is unqualified passing-away,
11   I, 3|     passage into what "is" without qualification is unqualified coming-to-be.
12   I, 3|        said to "pass-away" without qualification when they change into Wind
13   I, 3|            to "come to-be" without qualification, and others only to "come-to-be-so-and-so",
14   I, 3|         not to "come-tobe" without qualification, yet the growing thing is
15   I, 3|            to "come-to-be" without qualification, but only to "come-to-be-so-and-so".
16   I, 3|          things come to-be without qualification, but not others both in
17   I, 3|            a passing-away" without qualification when a thing has passed
18   I, 3|       which "is" not except with a qualification? Is it one of the two contrary
19  II, 7|       either is fully real without qualification, the other will exist potentially;
20  II, 7|           its full reality without qualification. There will result instead