Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |  accession. Nor did they give any account of "combination": and they
 2   I, 3 |  simultaneously become clear what account we ought to give of that
 3   I, 3 |         be considered adequate to account for coming-to-be and passing-away
 4   I, 5 |        too is impossible. For our account of growth must preserve
 5   I, 6 |           we must give a definite account of these three things—of "
 6   I, 6 |          that we "touch" him.~The account just given may serve to
 7   I, 7 |         We must conceive the same account to hold of action and passion
 8   I, 8 |           Moreover, how can their account of "vision through a medium"
 9   I, 9 | magnitudes. For us) the following account results from the distinctions
10   I, 10|          then, from the foregoing account, that "combination" occurs,
11  II, 1 |    actually says" that the truest account is to affirm that each of
12  II, 1 |       contrariety. A more precise account of these presuppositions
13  II, 6 |         more difficult for him to account for the coming-to-be which
14  II, 6 |          are Deities.)~Again, his account of motion is vague. For
15  II, 9 |         than they are adequate to account for the primary things.~
16  II, 9 |        the Forms" was adequate to account for coming-to-be. Thus Socrates
17  II, 9 |         was adequate by itself to account for coming-to-be, since "
18  II, 10|    theory-we have given a general account of the causes in an earlier