Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 6 |         without an agent and a patient there cannot be "altering"
 2   I, 6 |        be used in contrast to "patient" and (b) "patient" is to
 3   I, 6 | contrast to "patient" and (b) "patient" is to be applied only to
 4   I, 7 |      He asserts that agent and patient are identical, i.e. "like".
 5   I, 7 |   action and to act, agent and patient must be "like" (i.e. identical)
 6   I, 7 |       action.) Hence agent and patient must be in one sense identical,
 7   I, 7 |     one another. And since (a) patient and agent are generically
 8   I, 7 |      assimilates to itself the patient. For agent and patient are
 9   I, 7 |     the patient. For agent and patient are contrary to one another,
10   I, 7 |        the contrary: hence the patient must change into the agent,
11   I, 7 |        supposed that agent and patient must possess something identical,
12   I, 7 |   action itself. For agent and patient have not the same matter,
13   I, 7 |        the agent is there, the patient he-comes something: but
14   I, 7 |         states" are there, the patient no longer becomes but already
15   I, 8 |      certain pores, and so the patient suffers action. It is in
16   I, 8 |      no effect by touching the patient, neither will it produce
17   I, 10|       long time when agent and patient are present in bulk.~Hence,