Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |       distinct natures.~On this question, indeed, the early philosophers
 2   I, 2 |        find it. The fundamental question, in dealing with all these
 3   I, 2 |      the answer we give to this question makes the greatest difference.
 4   I, 3 |         term of the Category in question, we shall have, in "unqualified
 5   I, 3 |    further examination. For the question might be raised whether
 6   I, 3 |       comes-to-be? And the same question might be raised about "passing-away"
 7   I, 3 |     succeed in clearing up this question, it will simultaneously
 8   I, 3 |       and coming-to-be.~Our new question too-viz. "what is the cause
 9   I, 3 |         s coming-to-be. But the question subsequently formulated
10   I, 3 |       even to discuss the other question we raised-viz. why coming-to-be
11   I, 4 |   properties, the properties in question being opposed to one another
12   I, 5 |       diminish.~Hence our first question is this: Do these changes
13  II, 1 |       Nevertheless, even so the question remains: What sorts of contrarieties,
14  II, 6 | dissociation". No: the cause in question is the essential nature
15  II, 7 |      who maintain the theory in question, are not at liberty to conceive
16  II, 10|  Consequently the phenomenon in question occurs, because the "irregular"