Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2|           way paradoxical that every perceptible body should be indivisible
 2   I, 3|              difference between "the perceptible" and "the imperceptible".
 3   I, 3|          when there is a change into perceptible material, people say there
 4   I, 3|           whether it is more or less perceptible.~(ii) But why are some things
 5   I, 4|               when the substratum is perceptible and persists, but changes
 6   I, 4|             bronze. But when nothing perceptible persists in its identity
 7   I, 4| imperceptible something to something perceptible (either to touch or to all
 8   I, 5|               and further that every perceptible particle of it has become
 9  II, 1|         processes all presuppose the perceptible bodies as the condition
10  II, 1|         matter which underlies these perceptible bodies. Some maintain it
11  II, 1|            possibly exist without a "perceptible contrariety": this "Boundless",
12  II, 1|             there is a matter of the perceptible bodies (a matter out of
13  II, 1|       firstly that which potentially perceptible body, secondly the contrarieties (
14  II, 2|              originative sources" of perceptible body; and since "perceptible"
15  II, 2|         perceptible body; and since "perceptible" is equivalent to "tangible",
16  II, 2|       quality belonging to the other perceptible contrarieties either, constitutes