Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1 |         alteration", while others maintain that "alteration" and coming-to-be
 2   I, 1 |         of a single element, must maintain that coming-tobe and passing-away
 3   I, 1 |        things more than one, must maintain that "alteration" is distinct
 4   I, 2 |          Democritus and Leucippus maintain? Or are they planes, as
 5   I, 4 |           and "alteration"-for we maintain that these changes are distinct
 6   I, 7 |        affected in acting. For we maintain that one and the same "matter"
 7   I, 8 |           Whole is void; while to maintain that it is divisible at
 8   I, 8 |       part divided? Further, they maintain, it is equally necessary
 9   I, 10| constituents as the whole. But we maintain that, if "combination" has
10   I, 10|        can take place.~Now, as we maintain, some things are such as
11  II, 1 |          perceptible bodies. Some maintain it is single, supposing
12  II, 6 |       sense it is open to them to maintain that the "elements" are
13  II, 7 |         be conceived by those who maintain a theory like that of Empedocles?
14  II, 7 |       flesh". Those, however, who maintain the theory in question,
15  II, 9 |          by their agency (so they maintain) that everything else comes-to-be