Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 2 |             and every point. For the second predicate will at. tach
 2   I, 4 |              transparent or cold-the second thing, into which the first
 3   I, 5 | intrinsically or indirectly. And the second alternative necessarily
 4  II, 2 |         implies power to act and the second pair susceptibility. "Hot"
 5  II, 4 |           being dry and hot, and the second moist and cold: while in
 6  II, 4 |         being moist and hot, and the second moist and cold. It is evident,
 7  II, 4 |          qualities must change.~This second method of coming-to-be,
 8  II, 5 |              the same as F. Let this second contrariety be dryness and
 9  II, 7 |        transformed; and that (in the second place) out of the "elements"
10  II, 9 |             sense of "matter", and a second in the sense of "form":
11  II, 9 |            he and impossible for the second to~he. Other things, however,
12  II, 9 |             cause. Nevertheless this second theory is not right either.~
13  II, 9 |              only error. They make a second mistake in omitting the
14  II, 11|             individual comes-to-be a second time (for though your coming-to-be