Book, Paragraph

 1   I, 1|        especially since Strife and Love are still fighting with
 2  II, 6|           Earth. But neither is it Love and Strife: for the former
 3  II, 6| dissociated" not by Strife, but by Love: since the "elements" are
 4  II, 6|           explanation to say that "Love and Strife set things moving,
 5  II, 6|          unless the very nature of Love is a movement of this kind
 6  II, 6|            then, the movement that Love sets going? No: for, on
 7  II, 6|             and Strife rather than Love is its cause-so that in
 8  II, 6|     cause-so that in general, too, Love rather than Strife would
 9  II, 6|     contrary to nature. And unless Love or Strife is actually setting
10  II, 6|           formerly in the reign of Love. What, then, is the "first
11  II, 6|       their motion? Presumably not Love and Strife: on the contrary,