Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  1 |          For, as the Pythagoreans say, the world and all that
 2   I,  1 |         Of two things, or men, we say "both", but not "all": three
 3   I,  1 |   continuous. Whether we can also say that whatever is continuous
 4   I,  2 |        locomotion; for nature, we say, is their principle of movement.
 5   I,  2 |         away. And so, if, as some say, the body so moved is fire,
 6   I,  5 |     conceived as falling. This, I say, will be infinite: first,
 7   I,  6 |          time. And though you may say that the time of the movement
 8   I,  7 |           in quantity, that is to say, the water, fire, &c., which
 9   I,  7 |        these scattered particles, say, of fire, is infinite. But
10   I,  7 |        natural motion, that is to say, there is another place,
11   I,  7 |         in a patient less than B, say F. Then take E, bearing
12   I,  8 | difference can it make whether we say that a thing is this distance
13   I,  8 |          quite evident. Are we to say then that all their movements,
14   I,  9 |          Now it is quite right to say that the formula of the
15   I,  9 |       some of the stars; these we say are "in the heaven". (c)
16   I,  10|        but, generation over, some say that it is eternal, others
17   I,  10|        that it is eternal, others say that it is destructible
18   I,  10|           which is illusory. They say that in their statements
19   I,  10|         eternal and generated.~To say that the universe alternately
20   I,  10|           this theory, since they say that the contrary is the
21   I,  11|      first, where it is untrue to say that the thing can ever
22   I,  12|         absolutely impossible. To say that you are standing when
23   I,  12|       impossibility. Similarly to say that a man who is playing
24   I,  12|        singing, is singing, is to say what is false but not impossible.
25   I,  12|      false but not impossible. To say, however, that you are at
26   I,  12|           is commensurable, is to say what is not only false but
27   I,  12|          the destructible (H). To say then that there is no reason
28   I,  12|           It will then be true to say now that it does not exist
29   I,  12|      capacity. It will be true to say now that this exists last
30  II,  2 |          Since there are some who say that there is a right and
31  II,  2 |          way. At the start we may say that, if right and left
32  II,  2 |         prior to right, or let us say, since "prior" is ambiguous,
33  II,  2 |       right in anything is, as we say, the region in which locomotion
34  II,  6 |       remaining alternative is to say that the movement exhibits
35  II,  7 |           of thought as those who say that the stars are fiery
36  II,  9 |        the sun and the moon, they say, and all the stars, so great
37  II,  9 |       which made the Pythagoreans say that the motion of the stars
38  II,  9 |           same argument one might say it was absurd that on a
39  II,  9 |       creates no friction. We may say, then, in this matter that
40  II,  12|        with the fewest movements, say two, and the one next after
41  II,  12|     motion?~On these questions, I say, it is well that we should
42  II,  13|         view. At the centre, they say, is fire, and the earth
43  II,  13|    precious thing: but fire, they say, is more precious than earth,
44  II,  13|          of the earth. This, they say, accounts for the fact that
45  II,  13|         the earth. Others, again, say that the earth, which lies
46  II,  13|       have another argument. They say that because it is at rest,
47  II,  13|       little of the whole. Others say the earth rests upon water.
48  II,  13|         staying still. Thus, they say, it does not cut, but covers
49  II,  13|         The same immobility, they say, is produced by the flatness
50  II,  13|     representing fact. Bodies, we say, which have no natural movement,
51  II,  13|           staying there; and some say, in the manner explained,
52  II,  13|           among the ancients, who say that the earth keeps its
53  II,  14|          to keep to the truth and say that the reason of this
54 III,  2 |     Leucippus and Democritus, who say that the primary bodies
55 III,  3 |                   3~It remains to say what bodies are subject
56 III,  4 |        meaning. And further, they say that since the atomic bodies
57 III,  5 |          the elements is, as they say, synthesis, and generation
58 III,  5 |         order of nature. But they say that fire is of all bodies
59 III,  5 |        special shape will have to say that a part of fire is not
60 III,  5 |    Further, they too will have to say that the same body is relatively
61 III,  7 |         Empedocles and Democritus say, or as those who resolve
62 III,  7 |        resolve bodies into planes say, or is there yet another
63 III,  7 |         to maintain this, if they say that water is a body present
64 III,  7 |          those who take this view say, there is no expansion of
65 III,  8 |      angles, and the angles, they say, produce warmth and combustion.
66 III,  8 |          of large particles, they say, is cold because instead
67  IV,  1 |       such as wood and bronze, we say that the one is relatively
68  IV,  1 |        absurd. There can be, they say, no up and no down, since
69  IV,  2 |         obviously insufficient to say that bodies of equal weight
70  IV,  2 |      there are some who think and say that the cause is to be
71  IV,  2 |         elsewhere. The void, they say, which is imprisoned in
72  IV,  2 |        disappear. Thus fire, they say, is the lightest of things
73  IV,  4 |    uncompounded parts: that is to say, according as the one or
74  IV,  4 |          in the way. There are, I say, these two kinds of body,
75  IV,  5 |     consequently we shall have to say that air in a certain quantity