Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  7 |          presuppositions and to the view that neither that which
 2   I,  9 |       difficulty. From one point of view it might seem impossible
 3   I,  9 |            case, and equally on the view that no such entity has
 4   I,  9 |      philosophy often propounds the view that whatever is divine,
 5   I,  10|            before-especially on the view of those who hold this theory,
 6   I,  10|          are infinite in number the view is more plausible. But whether
 7   I,  10|     concerned we have answered this view with arguments appropriate
 8  II,  1 |          for its generation. If our view is a possible one, and the
 9  II,  1 |            If then, as we said, the view already stated of the first
10  II,  2 |     Pythagoreans-to whom indeed the view really belongs-we must consider
11  II,  2 |            just the opposite of the view of the Pythagoreans, who
12  II,  6 |          but every movement, in our view, proceeds from one point
13  II,  8 |           other at rest.~(2) On the view, first, that both are in
14  II,  9 |            concord corroborates our view. Bodies which are themselves
15  II,  11|           star, the most reasonable view is that they are spherical.
16  II,  12|            life and action. On this view the facts cease to appear
17  II,  13|      Pythagoreans take the contrary view. At the centre, they say,
18  II,  13|         facts of observation. Their view is that the most precious
19  II,  13|            this basis they take the view that it is not earth that
20  II,  13|            earth, then, this is the view which some advance, and
21  II,  13|             observed facts on their view that we do not dwell at
22  II,  13|          centre, than on the common view that the earth is in the
23  II,  13|            needs remain still. This view is ingenious but not true.
24  II,  14|            stay at the centre. This view is further supported by
25  II,  14|            the incredibility of the view of those who conceive that
26 III,  1 |     impossibilities involved in the view which asserts indivisible
27 III,  1 | consequences which result from this view in the mathematical sphere
28 III,  1 |            the impossibility of the view. It is impossible, if two
29 III,  2 |            neck." The answer to the view that there are infinite
30 III,  2 |             of the time. Thus their view brings them into the contrary
31 III,  3 |      Anaxagoras opposes Empedocles’ view of the elements. Empedocles
32 III,  4 |          suppose. We begin with the view of Anaxagoras that all the
33 III,  4 |             Any one who adopts this view misapprehends the meaning
34 III,  4 |         shows. Again, even on their view it turns out that all things
35 III,  4 |            and involution. Now this view in a sense makes things
36 III,  4 |             an infinity. Besides, a view which asserts atomic bodies
37 III,  5 |             involved equally in the view elements and distinguishes
38 III,  5 |           primary body an atom, the view will be open to the objections
39 III,  7 |              as those who take this view say, there is no expansion
40 III,  7 |           fact.~The result of their view is that earth has the best
41  IV,  1 |           we go on to state our own view of the matter.~Language
42  IV,  1 |             downward movement. (The view, urged by some, that there
43  IV,  2 |       triangles (of which, in their view, all these bodies are composed)
44  IV,  2 |          the water.~So much for one view of the distinction between
45  IV,  2 |       defect of void. On the former view there could be an amount
46  IV,  2 |          with these themselves. The view which bases the distinction
47  IV,  2 |           implies, equally with the view that there is but one matter,
48  IV,  4 |           the term "absolutely", in view of the generic character
49  IV,  4 |           water and air. But in our view the continent pertains to