Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  7|         form of parts separated by void, there must necessarily
 2   I,  9|          there is also no place or void or time outside the heaven.
 3   I,  9|           body can be present; and void is said to be that in which
 4   I,  9|        there is neither place, nor void, nor time, outside the heaven.
 5  II,  4|     circumference there is neither void nor place, from these grounds
 6  II,  4|        there is place and body and void without it. For a rectilinear
 7  II,  4|            have to admit space and void outside the moving body,
 8 III,  2|          perpetual movement in the void or infinite, may be asked
 9 III,  2|          unless an extra-corporeal void is possible. For, assuming
10 III,  2|        been previously occupied by void in which no body was. Now
11 III,  2|    existence of an extra-corporeal void must be admitted.~
12 III,  6|        requires an extra-corporeal void. For everything that comes
13 III,  6|         must be an extra-corporeal void. But we have already shown
14 III,  7|        enough. Now, if there is no void at all, and if, as those
15 III,  7|          manifest: and if there is void and expansion, there is
16  IV,  2|            be found elsewhere. The void, they say, which is imprisoned
17  IV,  2|       reason is that there is more void. And this would also account
18  IV,  2|         relatively large amount of void. This is the way they put
19  IV,  2|           not only on an excess of void, but also an a defect of
20  IV,  2|           if the ratio of solid to void exceeds a certain proportion,
21  IV,  2|        reason that it has the most void. But it would follow that
22  IV,  2|           gold, as containing more void than a small mass of fire,
23  IV,  2|            deny the existence of a void some, like Anaxagoras and
24  IV,  2|         denying the existence of a void, have attempted this, have
25  IV,  2|          to its containing so much void are necessarily involved
26  IV,  2|        other body, as well as more void, yet there will be a certain
27  IV,  2|         that there is an excess of void also. But the question is,
28  IV,  2|          solid or by its defect of void. On the former view there
29  IV,  2| distinction rests on the amount of void, there will be a body, lighter
30  IV,  2|          certain ratio between the void and the solid in a body
31  IV,  2|         the same ratio of solid to void, but the upward movement
32  IV,  2|            movement of bodies to a void which does not itself move.
33  IV,  2|     however, it is the nature of a void to move upward and of a
34  IV,  2|      reason why the plenum and the void are not eternally separated.
35  IV,  2|            imagine a place for the void, as if the void were not
36  IV,  2|            for the void, as if the void were not itself a kind of
37  IV,  2|          kind of place. But if the void is to move, it must have
38  IV,  2|        voidness: for it is not the void only which is moved, but
39  IV,  2|        matter and its contrary-the void, for instance, and the plenum-no
40  IV,  4|           and lightness to that of void. It is due to the properties
41  IV,  5|      things, as, for instance, the void or the plenum or extension
42  IV,  5|          matter in question is the void or something similar, which
43  IV,  5|          that the two asserted are void and plenum. Fire, then,
44  IV,  5|          as moving upward, will be void, earth, as moving downward,
45  IV,  5|     because it has something, e.g. void, which other things do not