Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  7 |       and place alike that any process of change is impossible
 2   I,  7 |     impossible for it to be in process of coming to be any of these.
 3   I,  10| alternation in the destructive process, which takes now this direction,
 4   I,  10|     into combination, and this process either has been, or could
 5   I,  10|     unordered; there must be a process and a lapse of time separating
 6   I,  11|     which formerly was not, no process of becoming or change being
 7   I,  11|      motion, since there is no process of coming to be in contact
 8   I,  11|  coming to be, with or without process, does not exist; such a
 9   I,  11|       afterwards is, whether a process of becoming was or was not
10   I,  11|     existence is due to a past process of becoming, or not yet
11   I,  11|       the word to that which a process of destruction may cause
12   I,  11|        now is not, without any process of destruction, like contact,
13  II,  14|     the centre is reached. The process should be conceived by supposing
14 III,  2 |      we shall have an infinite process, which is impossible. The
15 III,  2 |      we shall have an infinite process. The same difficulty is
16 III,  2 |    Empedocles begins after the process ruled by Love: for he could
17 III,  4 |      of the largest atoms is a process that will in time exhaust
18 III,  4 |    supply; and it is by such a process that they account for the
19 III,  6 |    every simple body undergo a process of analysis, which must
20 III,  6 |       the time occupied by the process will be infinite, and also
21 III,  6 |        occupied by the reverse process of synthesis. For the processes
22 III,  6 |      larger; and a destructive process which succeeds in destroying,
23 III,  7 |       illusion. They make it a process of excretion from a body
24 III,  7 |        from the earth, for the process is one of excretion. The
25 III,  7 |    cube a cube. But if (b) the process is resolution into planes,