Book,  Paragraph

 1   I,  5 |    revolve in a circle, and by argument also we have determined
 2   I,  5 |    makes no difficulty for our argument, since it is quite possible
 3   I,  6 |  infinite in weight. (The same argument applies to lightness: for
 4   I,  8 |     our universe, and that our argument applied only to those of
 5   I,  9 |       and ask how much of this argument is correct and how much
 6   I,  9 |    composite; so that the same argument will apply, since it makes
 7   I,  11|      make no difference to the argument, yet some confusion of mind
 8   I,  11|    however, does not touch our argument. The maximum may be determined
 9   I,  12|       Expresed universally our argument is as follows. Let there
10   I,  12|       be present, and the same argument holds of D.~Neither that
11   I,  12|       impossible. And the same argument shows that G is coincident
12  II,  1 |      immortal; and our present argument testifies that it is indestructible
13  II,  6 | perpetual retardation: for the argument holds of both and each),
14  II,  9 |      great? Starting from this argument and from the observation
15  II,  9 |        stream. Yet by the same argument one might say it was absurd
16  II,  13|   earth. But they have another argument. They say that because it
17  II,  13|    ingenious but not true. The argument would prove that everything,
18  II,  13|    centre. But so far as their argument goes, instead of remaining
19  II,  13|      but in fragments. For the argument applies equally to fire.
20  II,  14|       it in any way affect the argument if there is not a similar
21  II,  14|    shape, necessitated by this argument, follows also from the fact
22 III,  2 |   shall simply repeat the same argument; and either we shall come
23 III,  2 |       impossible. And the same argument would fit the case of lightness.
24 III,  5 |     supported by the following argument. As all bodies are composed
25 III,  7 |       defence of a position in argument. In the confidence that