Book,  Paragraph

 1  II,  1 |          believe that than follow Empedocles when he says that the world,
 2  II,  13|         Hence the sharp rebuke of Empedocles, in the words "if the deeps
 3  II,  13|        and flatness, others, with Empedocles, that the motion of the
 4  II,  13|           thing.~Further, against Empedocles there is another point which
 5 III,  2 |     suppose, is a moving thing-as Empedocles says that it is the vortex
 6 III,  2 |           flesh? Yet this is what Empedocles asserts to have occurred
 7 III,  2 |  separated and in movement. Hence Empedocles begins after the process
 8 III,  3 |            Now Anaxagoras opposes Empedocles’ view of the elements. Empedocles
 9 III,  3 | Empedocles’ view of the elements. Empedocles says that fire and earth
10 III,  4 |           the purpose as well, as Empedocles’ attempt shows. Again, even
11 III,  6 |           be either atomic or, as Empedocles seems to have intended,
12 III,  7 |        from one another? Is it as Empedocles and Democritus say, or as
13 III,  7 |          1) What the followers of Empedocles do, though without observing
14  IV,  2 |         some, like Anaxagoras and Empedocles, have not tried to analyse