Paragraph

 1 9 |    therefore be argued that it is necessary that affirmations or denials
 2 9 |        fortuitous it would not be necessary.~Again, to say that neither
 3 9 |          For example, it would be necessary that a sea-fight should
 4 9 |           through all time it was necessary that that should find fulfillment;
 5 9 |   to-morrow or not, but it is not necessary that it should take place
 6 9 |          to-morrow, neither is it necessary that it should not take
 7 9 |         not take place, yet it is necessary that it either should or
 8 9 |    therefore plain that it is not necessary that of an affirmation and
 9 12|      propositions, such as "it is necessary" and "it is impossible",
10 12|           contradictory of "it is necessary that it should be", is not "
11 12|         should be", is not "it is necessary that it should not be,"
12 12|           not be," but "it is not necessary that it should be", and
13 12|           contradictory of "it is necessary that it should not be" is "
14 12|      should not be" is "it is not necessary that it should not be".~
15 12|          is not impossible.~It is necessary. It is not necessary.~It
16 12|           is necessary. It is not necessary.~It is true. It is not true.~
17 13|         is not impossible and not necessary.~From the proposition "it
18 13|         it follows that it is not necessary that it should not be and
19 13| contingent" it follows that it is necessary that it should not be and
20 13|         be" it follows that it is necessary that it should be and that
21 13|         should be.~~~~~~It is not necessary that it should be. ~~~~It
22 13|           it should be. ~~~~It is necessary that it should not be.~~~~~~
23 13|     should not be.~~~~~~It is not necessary that it should not be. ~~~~
24 13|          should not be. ~~~~It is necessary that it should be.~~~ Now
25 13|        the proposition "it is not necessary that it should be" is not
26 13|        not the negative of "it is necessary that it should not be",
27 13|           subject; for when it is necessary that a thing should not
28 13|          should not be, it is not necessary that it should be. The reason
29 13|         to the proposition "it is necessary". For when it is impossible
30 13|          a thing should be, it is necessary, not that it should be,
31 13|        thing should not be, it is necessary that it should be. Thus,
32 13|         is impossible" and "it is necessary" are not equivalent, but,
33 13|          arranged. For when it is necessary that a thing should be,
34 13|         it follows that it is not necessary; it comes about therefore
35 13|            the proposition "it is necessary that it should be" does
36 13|       does the proposition "it is necessary that it should not be".
37 13|         also not be, but if it is necessary that it should be or that
38 13|        the proposition "it is not necessary that it should not be" follows
39 13|        the proposition "it is not necessary that it should not be" is
40 13|          should be" and by "it is necessary that it should not be",
41 13|        the proposition "it is not necessary that it should not be".
42 13|       from the proposition "it is necessary that it should be". If not,
43 13|     potentiality of that which is necessary in the unqualified sense
44 13|         particular, that which is necessary is also possible, though