Paragraph

 1 1 |            verb", then the terms "denial" and "affirmation", then "
 2 2 |         it is not a sentence or a denial. Let it then be called an
 3 4 |       will form an affirmation or denial. But if we separate one
 4 5 | affirmation, the next, the simple denial; all others are only one
 5 6 |      something about something, a denial a negative assertion.~Now
 6 6 |     contradict any affirmation or denial. Thus it is plain that every
 7 6 |       affirmation has an opposite denial, and similarly every denial
 8 6 |       denial, and similarly every denial an opposite affirmation.~
 9 7 |       affirmation is opposed to a denial in the sense which I denote
10 7 |       universal character and the denial is not. The affirmation "
11 7 |          the contradictory of the denial "not every man is white",
12 7 |           the affirmation and the denial are universal, as in the
13 7 |          is evident also that the denial corresponding to a single
14 7 |         is itself single; for the denial must deny just that which
15 7 |          is white" has its proper denial in the proposition "Socrates
16 7 |    predicate remain the same, the denial will not be the denial proper
17 7 |        the denial will not be the denial proper to that affirmation,
18 7 |          on that is distinct.~The denial proper to the affirmation "
19 7 |       shown further that a single denial is contradictorily opposite
20 8 |               8~An affirmation or denial is single, if it indicates
21 8 |         nor its opposite a single denial. For it is equivalent to
22 9 |           the affirmation nor the denial is true, maintaining, let
23 9 |         fact of an affirmation or denial on the part of anyone. For
24 9 |        and no more false than the denial; while some exhibit a predisposition
25 9 |     corresponding affirmation and denial have the same character.~
26 9 |           of an affirmation and a denial one should be true and the
27 10|      affirmation, then, and every denial, will consist of a noun
28 10|          can be no affirmation or denial without a verb; for the
29 10|           primary affirmation and denial are "as follows: "man is", "
30 10|     regards their affirmation and denial, correspond in their logical
31 10|          clear:~A. Affirmation B. Denial~Man is just Man is not just~\ /~
32 10|          is not just~\ /~X~/ \~D. Denial C. Affirmation~Man is not
33 10|        table:~A’. Affirmation B’. Denial~Every man is just Not every
34 10|       every man is just~\ /~X~D’. Denial / \ C’. Affirmation~Not
35 10|           But they are not. For a denial must always be either true
36 11|           about an affirmation or denial which, either positively
37 14|           finds its contrary in a denial or in another affirmation;
38 14|       rather in the corresponding denial. We must therefore consider
39 14|       false, that which forms the denial of the false judgement or
40 14|          plain that the universal denial is the contrary of the affirmation