Paragraph

 1 9 |      cannot not come to be, it is impossible that it should not come
 2 9 |        come to be, and when it is impossible that it should not come
 3 9 |          is to take up a position impossible to defend. In the first
 4 9 |         Yet this view leads to an impossible conclusion; for we see that
 5 11| predication of the simple term is impossible. Thus it is not right to
 6 11|           not the case, it is not impossible.~Yet the facts of the case
 7 12|        direction.~But since it is impossible that contradictory propositions
 8 12|          is necessary" and "it is impossible", may be dealt with in the
 9 12|           contradictory of "it is impossible that it should be" is not "
10 12|          should be" is not "it is impossible that it should not be" but "
11 12|     should not be" but "it is not impossible that it should be", and
12 12|           contradictory of "it is impossible that it should not be" is "
13 12|      should not be" is "it is not impossible that it should not be".~
14 12|          is not contingent.~It is impossible. It is not impossible.~It
15 12|          is impossible. It is not impossible.~It is necessary. It is
16 13|       follows also that it is not impossible and not necessary.~From
17 13|         not be and that it is not impossible that it should not be. From
18 13|      should not be and that it is impossible that it should be. From
19 13|          should be and that it is impossible that it should not be.~Let
20 13|        contingent.~~~~~~It is not impossible that it should be. ~~~~It
21 13|           it should be. ~~~~It is impossible that it should be.~~~~~~
22 13|     should not be.~~~~~~It is not impossible that it should not be. ~~~~
23 13|          should not be. ~~~~It is impossible that it should not be.~~~~~~
24 13|           the propositions "it is impossible that it should be" and "
25 13|         should be" and "it is not impossible that it should be" are consequent
26 13|         of the proposition "it is impossible" is consequent upon the
27 13|         in the second. For "it is impossible" is a positive proposition
28 13|        proposition and "it is not impossible" is negative.~We must investigate
29 13|       that the proposition "it is impossible" is equivalent, when used
30 13|        necessary". For when it is impossible that a thing should be,
31 13|     should not be, and when it is impossible that a thing should not
32 13|           the propositions "it is impossible" and "it is necessary" are
33 13|      connected.~Yet perhaps it is impossible that the contradictory propositions
34 13|         it is not possible, it is impossible, and it is thus impossible
35 13|        impossible, and it is thus impossible that a thing should be,
36 13|         it follows that it is not impossible, and from that it follows
37 13|         be" is followed by "it is impossible that it should be" and by "
38 13|        true to say that it is not impossible that it should walk (or,