Paragraph

 1 7 |                  7~Some things are universal, others individual. By the
 2 7 |           individual. By the term "universal" I mean that which is of
 3 7 |        predicated. Thus "man" is a universal, "Callias" an individual.~
 4 7 |    necessarily sometimes concern a universal subject, sometimes an individual.~
 5 7 |            negative proposition of universal character with regard to
 6 7 |         character with regard to a universal, these two propositions
 7 7 |       expression "a proposition of universal character with regard to
 8 7 |         character with regard to a universal", such propositions as "
 9 7 |       though they have regard to a universal, are yet not of universal
10 7 |          universal, are yet not of universal character, they will not
11 7 | propositions made with regard to a universal, but not of universal character,
12 7 |            a universal, but not of universal character, we may take the "
13 7 |          is not white". "Man" is a universal, but the proposition is
14 7 |      proposition is not made as of universal character; for the word "
15 7 |        does not make the subject a universal, but rather gives the proposition
16 7 |            gives the proposition a universal character. If, however,
17 7 |        same, the affirmation is of universal character and the denial
18 7 |     affirmation and the denial are universal, as in the sentences "every
19 7 |           to universals and have a universal character, one must be true
20 7 |           the propositions are not universal, it is not always the case
21 7 |            affirmation both in the universal or particular character
22 8 |         not whether the subject is universal and whether the statement
23 8 |        whether the statement has a universal character, or whether this
24 9 |         either when the subject is universal and the propositions are
25 9 |          the propositions are of a universal character, or when it is
26 9 |        whereas when the subject is universal, but the propositions are
27 9 |          propositions are not of a universal character, there is no such
28 10|          not give to the subject a universal significance, but implies
29 10|           being indefinite and not universal in character. Thus the adjectives "
30 12|     walking".~If then this rule is universal, the contradictory of "it
31 13|            is this: that since the universal is consequent upon the particular,
32 14|    contrary, then the principle is universal in its application.~Again,
33 14|        positive judgement, for the universal negative judgement will
34 14|         subject be understood in a universal sense, is equivalent to
35 14|        words, it is plain that the universal denial is the contrary of