Paragraph

 1 2 |          they do not, as they are, form a proposition either true
 2 2 |       words do not, as they stand, form either a true or a false
 3 3 |           note of time, and always form a predicate, there is no
 4 3 |     copulation, of which we cannot form a conception apart from
 5 4 |          added that the whole will form an affirmation or denial.
 6 8 |            which do not combine to form one, the affirmation is
 7 8 |           significance, and do not form a single proposition, it
 8 11|        name, yet do not combine to form a unity. Thus, man may be
 9 11|        three predicates combine to form a unity. On the other hand,
10 11|          therefore, if these three form the subject of an affirmation,
11 11|           affirmation, nor if they form its predicate, is there
12 11|       plain that a question of the form "what is it?" is not a dialectical
13 11| dialectical questioner must by the form of his question give his
14 11|      question into a more definite form, and inquire, e.g.. whether
15 11|       separate predicates unite to form a single predicate. Let
16 11|         another, do not combine to form a unity. Take the proposition "
17 11|         musical do not coalesce to form a unity, for they belong
18 11|        terms "musical" and "white" form a unity, for it is only
19 11|           two will, therefore, not form a unity.~Thus, again, whereas,
20 11|          predicates, again, cannot form a unity, of which the one
21 12|          its positive and negative form respectively. Thus the contradictory
22 14|            discover which of these form contraries.~Now if the spoken
23 14|    consider, therefore, what would form the contrary of the true
24 14|            negative judgement will form the contrary. For instance,