Paragraph

 1 3 |           time, and always form a predicate, there is no specified name
 2 6 |         have the same subject and predicate. The identity of subject
 3 6 |        identity of subject and of predicate must not be "equivocal".
 4 7 |      character. If, however, both predicate and subject are distributed,
 5 7 |         be the subject though the predicate remain the same, the denial
 6 9 |          or false, then any given predicate must either belong to the
 7 9 |           other will not. For the predicate cannot both belong and not
 8 10|          no name; the subject and predicate in an affirmation must each
 9 10|          of an indefinite noun or predicate, such as "not-man" or "not-just",
10 10|           position of subject and predicate in a sentence involves no
11 10|           position of subject and predicate does not affect the sense
12 11| affirmation, nor if they form its predicate, is there any unity about
13 11| predicates unite to form a single predicate. Let us consider under what
14 11|      subject, it follows that the predicate resulting from their combination
15 11|          white man. Again, if the predicate "white" belongs to him,
16 11|           the combination of that predicate with the former composite
17 11|         with the former composite predicate will be permissible. Thus
18 11|        thus we cannot combine the predicate "white" again and again
19 11|           hand, it is possible to predicate a term simply of any one
20 12|        said, either that the same predicate can be both applicable and
21 13|      propositions and those which predicate necessity. That there is
22 13|          be), but while we cannot predicate this latter kind of potentiality
23 13|         sense of the word, we can predicate the former.~Our conclusion,