Paragraph

 1 5 |         two feet" can be called single; for it is not the circumstance
 2 5 |         call those propositions single which indicate a single
 3 5 |         single which indicate a single fact, or the conjunction
 4 7 |       denial corresponding to a single affirmation is itself single;
 5 7 |    single affirmation is itself single; for the denial must deny
 6 7 |       have shown further that a single denial is contradictorily
 7 7 |   contradictorily opposite to a single affirmation and we have
 8 8 |        affirmation or denial is single, if it indicates some one
 9 8 |    whether this is not so. Such single propositions are: "every
10 8 |          the affirmation is not single. For instance, if a man
11 8 |        is white" would not be a single affirmation, nor its opposite
12 8 | affirmation, nor its opposite a single denial. For it is equivalent
13 8 |   propositions have more than a single significance, and do not
14 8 | significance, and do not form a single proposition, it is plain
15 10|  affirmation must each denote a single thing. I have already explained’
16 10|       does in a certain sense a single thing. Similarly the expression "
17 11|       which, though they have a single recognized name, yet do
18 11|    above predicates cannot be a single proposition. For as I have
19 11|       Topics, question is not a single one, even if the answer
20 11|      predicates unite to form a single predicate. Let us consider