Paragraph

 1 2 |              a noun.~The expression "not-man" is not a noun. There is
 2 10|          stated that the expression "not-man" was not a noun, in the
 3 10|         there are the propositions: "not-man is", "not-man is not". Again
 4 10|         propositions: "not-man is", "not-man is not". Again we have the
 5 10|            man is not", "all that is not-man is", "all that is not-man
 6 10|            not-man is", "all that is not-man is not". The same classification
 7 10|              term be conjoined with "not-man", the latter forming a kind
 8 10|            of subject. Thus:~A.” B.”~Not-man is just Not-man is not just~\ /~
 9 10|              A.” B.”~Not-man is just Not-man is not just~\ /~X~D.” / \
10 10|           not just~\ /~X~D.” / \ C.”~Not-man is not not-just Not-man
11 10|              Not-man is not not-just Not-man is not-just~This is an exhaustive
12 10|              subject the expression "not-man".~When the verb "is" does
13 10| does-not-enjoy-health", "all that is not-man enjoys health", "all that
14 10|         enjoys health", "all that is not-man does-not-enjoy-health".
15 10|             does not enjoy health"; "not-man enjoys health", "not man
16 10|          noun or predicate, such as "not-man" or "not-just", may seem
17 10|              either be "white is not not-man" or "white is not man".
18 10|            the proposition "white is not-man", and the latter of these
19 12|            is" is "man is not", not "not-man is", and the contradictory
20 12|             man does not walk", not "not-man walks"; for to say "man