Paragraph

 1 6 |        every affirmation has an opposite denial, and similarly every
 2 6 |       similarly every denial an opposite affirmation.~We will call
 3 7 |       denial is contradictorily opposite to a single affirmation
 4 7 |        with regard to a pair of opposite propositions it is not always
 5 8 |     single affirmation, nor its opposite a single denial. For it
 6 9 |          the proposition to the opposite effect was true. And if
 7 9 |      may issue in either of two opposite directions. Again, if a
 8 9 |      one proposition false, the opposite would still be untrue. Secondly,
 9 9 |        and yet can issue in the opposite direction by exception.~
10 10|       thus set out two pairs of opposite propositions; there are
11 10| enumeration of all the pairs of opposite propositions that can possibly
12 10|         not just", which is the opposite of "every man is not-just",
13 11|       the adjunct there is some opposite which involves a contradiction,
14 11|     stated thus: when some such opposite elements are present, resolution
15 12|      also a potentiality in the opposite direction.~But since it
16 13|     should be. (For if not, the opposite follows, since one or the
17 13|         are irrational admit of opposite results. However, thus much
18 13|    potentiality which admits of opposite results, even where the
19 14|         from one extreme to its opposite; therefore error is a like