Paragraph

 1 5 |        circumstance that the words follow in unbroken succession that
 2 9 |            others of the same kind follow, if it is an irrefragable
 3 9 |             a certain result would follow, while, if we did not, the
 4 9 |          not, the result would not follow. For a man may predict an
 5 11|              say "a poet"; does it follow that Homer is, or does it
 6 13|               13~Logical sequences follow in due course when we have
 7 13|        case, contrary propositions follow respectively from contradictory
 8 13|       predicating necessity do not follow in the same kind of sequence
 9 13| impossibility or non-impossibility follow without change of subject
10 13|         predicating necessity must follow with the contrary subject;
11 13|        since one or the other must follow; so, if it is not possible,
12 13|        that it should be" does not follow from the proposition "it
13 13|         contradictory propositions follow contradictory in the way
14 13|             the contradictory must follow, namely that it cannot be,
15 13|          not be, and thus it would follow that a thing which must