Paragraph

 1 5 |      succession that effects the unity. This inquiry, however,
 2 5 |        parts of which results in unity: those propositions, on
 3 11|                   11~There is no unity about an affirmation or
 4 11|         do not combine to form a unity. Thus, man may be an animal,
 5 11|     predicates combine to form a unity. On the other hand, the
 6 11|          predicate, is there any unity about that affirmation.
 7 11|   affirmation. In both cases the unity is linguistic, but not real.~
 8 11|         do not combine to form a unity. Take the proposition "man
 9 11|        do not coalesce to form a unity, for they belong only accidentally
10 11|      musical" and "white" form a unity, for it is only incidentally
11 11|      will, therefore, not form a unity.~Thus, again, whereas, if
12 11| predicates, again, cannot form a unity, of which the one is implicit