Paragraph

 1 5 |          presence of something in a subject or its absence, in the present,
 2 6 |   contradictory which have the same subject and predicate. The identity
 3 6 |          predicate. The identity of subject and of predicate must not
 4 7 |       sometimes concern a universal subject, sometimes an individual.~
 5 7 |            every" does not make the subject a universal, but rather
 6 7 |         however, both predicate and subject are distributed, the proposition
 7 7 |     contradictory", when, while the subject remains the same, the affirmation
 8 7 |          with reference to the same subject; for instance "not every
 9 7 |         affirms concerning the same subject, and must correspond with
10 7 |         particular character of the subject and in the distributed or
11 7 |        negatively predicated of the subject or if anything else be the
12 7 |             if anything else be the subject though the predicate remain
13 8 |             one fact about some one subject; it matters not whether
14 8 |             matters not whether the subject is universal and whether
15 9 |    contradictories, either when the subject is universal and the propositions
16 9 |             false; whereas when the subject is universal, but the propositions
17 9 |          previous chapter.~When the subject, however, is individual,
18 9 |           must either belong to the subject or not, so that if one man
19 9 |        belong and not belong to the subject at one and the same time
20 10|             a fact with regard to a subject, and this subject is either
21 10|       regard to a subject, and this subject is either a noun or that
22 10|         that which has no name; the subject and predicate in an affirmation
23 10|             rule holds good, if the subject is distributed. Thus we
24 10|            latter forming a kind of subject. Thus:~A.” B.”~Not-man is
25 10|             since it employs as its subject the expression "not-man".~
26 10|         every" does not give to the subject a universal significance,
27 10|              but implies that, as a subject, it is distributed. This
28 10|        significance except that the subject, whether in a positive or
29 10|          with reference to the same subject. Sometimes, however, the
30 10|        evident, also, that when the subject is individual, if a question
31 10|       conversion of the position of subject and predicate in a sentence
32 10|            the relative position of subject and predicate does not affect
33 11|             many things of the same subject, unless that which is indicated
34 11|             if these three form the subject of an affirmation, nor if
35 11|        predicates truly belong to a subject, it follows that the predicate
36 11|           also truly belongs to the subject, many absurd results ensue.
37 11|   predicates, and terms forming the subject of predication, which are
38 11|       accidental either to the same subject or to one another, do not
39 11|            accidentally to the same subject. Nor yet, if it were true
40 11|            predicates belong to the subject in their own proper sense
41 11|           the individual may be the subject of the simple propositions
42 12| impossibility or necessity: for the subject is not without difficulty.~
43 12|          proposition is true of any subject, it will turn out true to
44 12|            both be true of the same subject, it follows that" it may
45 12|    inapplicable to one and the same subject at the same time, or that
46 12|           never be true of the same subject at the same time, for they
47 12|            at once true of the same subject.~The propositions which
48 13|             may be true of the same subject; for when it is necessary
49 13|           when used with a contrary subject, to the proposition "it
50 13|            follow without change of subject from those predicating possibility
51 13|            follow with the contrary subject; for the propositions "it
52 14|            true, which concerns the subject’s intrinsic nature, then
53 14|           be predicated of the same subject. It remains, therefore,
54 14|             is good is good, if the subject be understood in a universal
55 14|          affirmation about the same subject. Thus the propositions "
56 14|           the same time in the same subject.~THE END~ ~