Paragraph

 1 7 |        these two propositions are "contrary". By the expression "a proposition
 2 7 |        character, they will not be contrary, albeit the meaning intended
 3 7 |      meaning intended is sometimes contrary. As instances of propositions
 4 7 |    proposition thus constituted is contrary to truth; no affirmation
 5 7 |           we have also stated that contrary are distinct from contradictory
 6 7 |         propositions and which the contrary are; also that with regard
 7 9 | alternative, and a potentiality in contrary directions, the corresponding
 8 10|        case be the same.~Since the contrary of the proposition "every
 9 10|      contradictory, the former the contrary. Negative expressions, which
10 13|            is clear. In this case, contrary propositions follow respectively
11 13|       equivalent, when used with a contrary subject, to the proposition "
12 13|     necessity must follow with the contrary subject; for the propositions "
13 13|            one result, that is, of contrary results; those that are
14 14|           an affirmation finds its contrary in a denial or in another
15 14|       every man is just" finds its contrary in the proposition "no man
16 14|     thought, that judgement is the contrary of another, which pronounces
17 14|        another, which pronounces a contrary fact, in the way, for instance,
18 14|          man is just" pronounces a contrary to that pronounced by the
19 14|       judgement which pronounces a contrary fact that is the contrary
20 14|          contrary fact that is the contrary of another, then one affirmation
21 14|      affirmation will not find its contrary in another, but rather in
22 14|        which true judgement is the contrary of the false, that which
23 14|          or that which affirms the contrary fact.~Let me illustrate.
24 14|         bad. Which of these two is contrary to the true? And if they
25 14|            of expression forms the contrary?~It is an error to suppose
26 14|    judgements are to be defined as contrary in virtue of the fact that
27 14|            the fact that they have contrary subjects; for the judgement
28 14|          Yet the subjects here are contrary. But judgements are not
29 14|             But judgements are not contrary because they have contrary
30 14|         contrary because they have contrary subjects, but because they
31 14|            because they are to the contrary effect.~Now if we take the
32 14|   judgements must rather be termed contrary to the true judgements,
33 14|        asserts the presence of the contrary quality. But it is the man
34 14|            that judgement which is contrary to the true who is most
35 14|          the two judgements one is contrary to the true judgement, but
36 14|    contradictory is the more truly contrary, then the latter, it seems,
37 14|      latter, it seems, is the real contrary. The judgement that that
38 14| contradictory is either always the contrary or never; therefore, if
39 14|            Now where terms have no contrary, that judgement is false,
40 14|          cases the negative is the contrary, then the principle is universal
41 14|     therefore, what would form the contrary of the true judgement that
42 14|          true judgements are never contrary and this judgement might
43 14|   judgement that it is not bad the contrary, for this too might be true,
44 14|           that it is not good, the contrary judgement is that it is
45 14|        that it is not good, is the contrary of the judgement that it
46 14|            judgement will form the contrary. For instance, the contrary
47 14|        contrary. For instance, the contrary of the judgement that everything
48 14|            universal denial is the contrary of the affirmation about
49 14|           true propositions can be contrary the one to the other. For
50 14|        time without inconsistency, contrary propositions are those which
51 14| propositions are those which state contrary conditions, and contrary
52 14|           contrary conditions, and contrary conditions cannot subsist