Paragraph

 1 1|           conditioned by lapse of time. As already observed, there
 2 1|      memory, therefore, implies a time elapsed; consequently only
 3 1|      those animals which perceive time remember, and the organ
 4 1|       organ whereby they perceive time is also that whereby they
 5 1|          unless in connexion with time, is another question. Now,
 6 1|     faculty by which one cognizes time (i.e. by that which is also
 7 1|        objects (magnitude, motion time) is effected by the (said
 8 1|         the faculty of perceiving time. Whenever one actually remembers
 9 1|       latter" is a distinction in time.~Accordingly if asked, of
10 1|        moved owing to passion, or time of life, no mnemonic impression
11 1|       faculty whereby we perceive time.~
12 2| experience has undergone lapse of time. For one remembers now what
13 2|      identical.~Again, (even when time has elapsed, and one can
14 2|           a greater and a smaller time; and it is reasonable to
15 2|         that corresponding to its time concur, then one actually
16 2|         that corresponding to the time, or, if the latter takes
17 2|         movement answering to the time is of two kinds. Sometimes
18 2|         determinate notion-of the time. Still, even though one
19 2|       actual determination of the time, he genuinely remembers,
20 2| determinately the exact length of time implied in the "when".~It