Paragraph

 1 4 |          that it depends from an original which is immovable.~Now
 2 5 |      growth? Now the question of original generation and decay is
 3 8 |          has been explained, the original of movement, and upon the
 4 8 |         be situate in a definite original. Now we have said that a
 5 8 | elbow-joint would be situate the original seat of the moving soul.
 6 8 |       evident that the soul, the original of movement, could not lie
 7 8 |       which is moved, nor in the original point which causes movement.
 8 8 |    example shows that the moving original which derives from the soul
 9 8 |       then of necessity that the original cannot lie in any individual
10 8 |        the stick the hand is the original, but the original of the
11 8 |         is the original, but the original of the hand’s movement is
12 8 |        wrist. And so if the true original is not in the hand, be-there
13 8 |          up, neither is the true original in the wrist, for once more
14 9 |  stationary, nor vice versa; the original must always be in what lies
15 9 |       above both. Therefore, the original seat of the moving soul
16 9 |         so, if the region of the original of movement is altered in
17 9 |          simultaneously from the original seat of movement, and when
18 10|      stand to the soul-centre or original in a relation analogous