Book, Paragraph

 1   I,  1|    goodness or badness of the method used by a professor in his
 2   I,  1|      be able to criticize the method of a professed exposition,
 3   I,  1|       he to follow some other method? And when these questions
 4   I,  1|     that we should follow the method already mentioned, and begin
 5   I,  1| inadequate, and that the true method is to state what the definitive
 6   I,  1|   failed in hitting upon this method of treatment was, that they
 7   I,  1|    adopting it as a necessary method in natural science, but
 8   I,  1|      approach was made to the method. But at this period men
 9   I,  1|       benefit mankind.~Of the method itself the following is
10   I,  1|     we have an example of the method which we must adopt, and
11   I,  2|  bipartite division. But this method is often difficult, and
12   I,  2|      not to be broken up, the method of Dichotomy cannot be employed,
13   I,  2|   instance, would, under this method, have to be dismembered,
14   I,  3|    difficulty will occur.~The method then that we must adopt
15   I,  3|      one as in dichotomy. The method of dichotomy is either impossible (
16   I,  4|    canons for criticizing the method of natural science, and
17   I,  5|     are made. So much for the method to be pursued. Let us now
18 III,  5|    viscera and apply the same method of inquiry to them.~